|
It's All About Location
How are Holes Determined?
Experts Rely on Old-Fashioned Technology
By Ken Klavon, USGA
Olympia Fields, Ill.. -- The cadence was rhythmic. Much like
a quarterback at the line of scrimmage, Tom Meeks barked out
his play.
"OK, we've got a seven and a five right," says Meeks. "Then
we have a nine and then a … OK, now get a 17 and a five right.
Then I need a 20 and a four."
|
Click to View 2003 U.S. Open Hole
Locations
|
|
|
The three other bystanders took note and moved to the beat.
Only this was no football game. Rather, it just was another
exercise in how the USGA decides hole locations prior to a
U.S. Open. The numbers that permeated the air were the amount
of paces (to represent feet) from the front fringe of the
green.
Each morning during championship week Meeks, Director of
the Rules of Competition for the USGA, and USGA Director of
Championship Agronomy Tim Moraghan set out at the crack of
dawn to study potential hole locations on each green. Sometimes
they're up so early that it is they, in case you're wondering,
who shake the birds from their nighttime slumber.
"Our goal," says Moraghan, "has been that we want to offer
a competitive course in which the players are going to use
a variety of shots and hopefully all of their clubs."
That's why, believe it or not, hole placement is so important.
The location of a hole can dictate how a player approaches
the green starting at the tee. Players are given hole-location
sheets before the start of every round, which contains exact
yardage to the flagstick. A second sheet that the players
don't see is the one Meeks and Moraghan carry, the one that
shows how hard each hole is based on a scale ranging from
one to four, with one being the hardest.
"The players are really mathematicians," says Moraghan. "It's
all about math. Now add into it that they're great players.
They and their caddies are so precise; it's the difference
between knowing how far an 8- or 9-iron will get them."
Meeks, in a moment of defense, intimates, "I had one player
at one of the Opens who came up to me and said, 'Based on
your hole location sheet, I should have had a hole-in-one.'
He just didn't think our measurements jived with his."
In determining where a hole should go, Meeks relies on old-fashioned
technology. He uses paint cans on the greens as markers. After
each measurement is read aloud, a different colored paint
spray can is placed on each potential location. There are
four spray cans to represent each round.
Meeks putts three to four golf balls at the various eight-inch-high
paint cans. The main reason why they're placed at different
points on the green is so Meeks can get a better understanding
of the slope and undulations; and also to grasp the green's
degree of difficulty.
"If it [the ball] picks up speed, then we've got to adjust.
Players know that if they get above the hole, they have their
work cut for him," says Meeks.
As putts are considered satisfactory, dots are sprayed onto
the green to mak their place. In the midst of an Open, nothing
could be worse than having to scramble to replace a lost hole
location.
As Moraghan relates, "It's more than just picking four spots
on the green. Anyone can put a hole in the ground. That's
easy. But we want this as accurate and true of a test as we
can. We want to challenge the players."
That's why Moraghan starts the process by focusing on four
factors: One, he looks at the design of the course and thinks
how the architect wanted it to be played.
Second, the incoming shot is factored in. How it'll bounce,
how it will sit and and, ultimately, how it will lie. Next,
the contours of the course are studied from a wide array of
angles, which, lastly, leads to the paint-can putting test.
Ken Klavon is the USGA Web Editor. E-mail him at kklavon@usga.org
with questions and comments.
|